Monday, April 23, 2012

Consumer Power

As consumer power goes viral, company branding quakes

22-year old DC activist takes on Verizon

Fri Jan 6, 2012 1:02pm EST
(Reuters) - Corporate America's worst nightmare lives in a tiny one-bedroom apartment, loves browsing in flea markets and has a lop-eared brown and white pet rabbit named Crackers.
 
Meet Molly Katchpole. The 22-year-old Washington, D.C. resident has recently tangled with a couple of billion-dollar corporations, and cowed them into submission, without breaking a sweat.

Take Verizon Wireless, which had planned a $2 "convenience" charge for the privilege of paying a bill by phone or online. Katchpole, a Verizon user for eight years, was offended by the very idea that loyal customers could be penalized for paying what they owed. So she went on the website Change.org - organized a petition - and watched as it quickly racked up more than 165,000 signatures. As consumer outrage went viral, Verizon backpedaled within hours.

And how about Bank of America's infamous $5 monthly usage fee for debit cards? It too was kiboshed, partly thanks to another Katchpole petition and 300,000 of her outraged brethren, at a time when the Occupy Wall Street movement had been pressuring banks.

"I'm not exactly sure what these companies are thinking," says Katchpole, who only graduated last spring from Roger Williams University in Rhode Island and now works as a fellow at the nonprofit Rebuild the Dream, an organization that lobbies against income inequality (her petitions are personal ventures, unrelated to her job).

"It's so out of touch with reality and what their customers are going through. My Verizon petition was only up for about eight hours before they backed down."
Also forced into a recent and embarrassing climb-down was video-streaming company Netflix, which had planned to spin off DVD rentals into a stand-alone service called Qwikster. User objections became so deafening that the notion was killed before launch.

"The Internet is the great equalizer, and that's a beautiful thing - even if it's not positive for us," said Netflix spokesman Steve Swasey. "We made mistakes that hurt our brand, consumers let us know about it, and now we're rebuilding step by step."

Such is the growing power of social media, which can make consumer complaints go viral and cause serious brand damage within days or even hours. While one person can't topple a company, if that person is able to assemble an army of hundreds of thousands behind them, they become a force to be reckoned with.
Thanks to the increasingly savvy use of tools like Facebook and Twitter, the power balance between company and customer has been tilting in the latter's favor.

"Consumers have always had a voice, but now it's louder and it spreads so quickly because of social media," says Laura Ries, president of branding firm Ries & Ries in Atlanta. "Companies used to have a lot of time to think about strategy, to have meetings and studies, and to take time to respond. They don't have that time anymore. Now it's all about rapid response."

Consider the introduction of New Coke, one of the great marketing disasters of all time, which took almost three months to get reversed back in 1985. The Bank of America debit-card charge plan withstood a month of public fury before it was killed.

"Our customers' voices are most important to us," Bank of America co-COO David Darnell said in a written statement (the firm declined comment for this article). "As a result, we are not currently charging the fee and will not be moving forward with any additional plans to do so."

This time around, with Verizon Wireless, reaction was even faster. CEO Dan Mead scrambled to issue this statement: "At Verizon, we take great care to listen to our customers. Based on their input, we believe the best path forward is to encourage customers to take advantage of the best and most efficient options, eliminating the need to institute the fee at this time." Translation: Verizon executives (who also declined comment for this article) witnessed the venomous public reaction, and backtracked within a day.

"Someone at Verizon thought this was a reasonable way to add millions to the bottom line, and they were wrong," says Seth Godin, author of marketing classics like "Purple Cow" and "Unleashing the Ideavirus." "Consumers are speaking up more loudly and with more vehemence than ever before, and they're doing it in public."
Make no mistake, corporations are taking note of this sea change - and are often capitalizing on their rivals' foibles.
The credit union Mission Federal, for instance, responded to the bank fee controversy by offering to reward customers up to $5 a month for using its debit cards, said the credit union's CEO Debra Schwartz.
"Companies are now saying, 'Wow, we have to be careful about how we do this,' " says Jean-Manuel Izaret, a partner and pricing expert with management consultants Boston Consulting Group. "Clearly Netflix, Bank of America and Verizon didn't apply best practices, and had their pricing moves rejected by the market. It used to be just the press putting pressure on corporations, but now we're way beyond that."
So now that consumers are realizing the power of the social-media megaphone, how are they going to wield it - and how are embattled companies going to respond? Here are a few predictions from the experts:

* Companies need to act at warp speed. Mistakes are made in the business world. But companies can limit any lasting damage to their brands by recognizing potentially devastating memes, and acting quickly to contain them, with their own equivalent of political 'War Rooms'. "If you don't respond to a fire on the Internet, it only tends to get bigger," says Ries. "But even though word can spread rapidly these days, if you stay on top of it, it can be forgotten just as rapidly."
* Rollouts will become more thoughtful. To avoid such out-of-control wildfires, companies should act preemptively and consider consumer reaction to boardroom decisions before the public does it for them. If charges are new and not shared by a firm's competitors, for instance, a backlash is entirely predictable. Focus groups and regional test rollouts could help companies gauge reaction before a casual decision morphs into a full-fledged disaster.
* Consumers should pick their fights. Activists like Katchpole have certainly notched some high-profile victories, but if everybody starts complaining about every little thing, then collective outrage could lose some of its power. As a result, make sure to focus on the meaningful instead of the petty.
* Get ready for more. Consumers still make up something of an archipelago, each pushing his or her own issue with an online petition here, a Twitter hashtag there. While some issues like the Bank of America debit-card charge catch fire in the public imagination, many don't. But if consumers do manage to get truly organized, watch out.

"What would happen if all pricing was shared by all consumers, or if everyone stood up for the person who was being thrown out of their house, or if at the very moment you're choosing a wireless carrier, you could see an updated chart of customer-service wait times?" asks Godin. "If the volume of consumer outcry gets even louder, and the coordination gets even better, it will forever change what we do as marketers."
At least, that's what Molly Katchpole hopes. She's not sure which corporate decision she'll be targeting next, in between her trips to the laundry and the grocery store, but no doubt another one will be coming along soon.

"You used to have to make phone calls and write letters," she says. "But companies can't hide this stuff anymore; just take a look at their Facebook walls and all the angry comments. I really hope they take these lessons to heart."

New York Times - E-Commerce Wrapped in a Music Video

April 23, 2012, 9:50 am
 
 
Just another way that e-commerce is changing and where business strategies are being integrated

E-Commerce Wrapped in a Music Video

Popdust, a music news site, where you can also purchase the looks.
Popdust, a music news site, where you can also purchase the looks.
“Fashion Star” on NBC is probably the extreme example of the possibilities of merging content and commerce with pop stars, designers and even top-tier retailers. But those lines have been blurring for some time, as magazines adopt e-commerce strategies (expect a big push from Harper’s Bazaar this fall) and retailers continue to delve into the medium of social commerce.
One good example, or at least an innovative one, of where this all may be heading can be found this week over at Popdust, a music news site. A new video introduced on Monday shows Amy Heidemann and Nick Noonan, the excessively chirpy pop duo known as Karmin (who are themselves the product of a viral video sensation on the Internet), trying on a variety of clothes. If you like what they are wearing, you can buy it right from the site. And Karmin gets a cut of the sales.
What’s also interesting is that the Popdust project has tie-ins with a number of other partners: Look TV, a new fashion channel from the creators of “Project Runway,” which is connected to YouTube; Lucky magazine, which is featuring some of the Karmin-curated collection on its Web site; and a number of designers whose products are being sold.
In the video, Ms. Heidemann and Mr. Noonan try on a few outfits while looking cutesy and then model them with enough enthusiasm to qualify as an audition tape for HSN. Their song “Brokenhearted” plays in the background.
“I’ll tell you why I like this outfit,” Ms. Heidemann says at one point, wearing a Jack by BB Dakota striped skirt and a floral-print top from Topshop. “Because summertime is coming, and everybody needs a cute skirt with pockets.”
Given that Karmin’s breakthrough was a cover of Chris Brown’s “Look at Me Now” that was viewed millions of times on YouTube, Hugh Panero, the chief executive of Popdust, said the potential reach of the video could be quite large. And further projects are in the works as Popdust develops its e-commerce.
“There is a whole evolution of commerce going on,” Mr. Panero said. “How that takes shape, where you are integrating commerce into editorial into music, is all coming together in different ways. We’re just one of the ways that it is coming together.”

Samsung introduces SMART TV 2012

Samsung's new SMART TV allows consumers to acess the internet with a flick of a finger in the air. They are also able to do this from the comfort of their living room couch. We talked about making online payments in class and I believe the new SMART TV is going to change online e-commerce. Customers may be more willing to make purchases while moving their hands in the air, rather than having to click a mouse sitting at their desk.




Samsung introduces SMART TV 2012


Posted on 19 April 2012 - 04:52pm

Last updated on 19 April 2012 - 05:23pm

KUALA LUMPUR (April 19, 2012): Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, a leading name in digital media and convergence, today launched its latest range of products.



These included its SMART television series, Plasma television, SMART Blu-ray home entertainment system and Blu-ray player.



"Samsung is working across its home entertainment product portfolio, and it has removed the barriers that exist between devices and content to deliver a smarter, simpler and more connected life for consumers," Chong Xu Jenn, product marketing leader of AV business unit, told a press conference here today.



"Samsung's range of SMART TV 2012 offers consumers the SMART Interaction, SMART Content and SMART Evolution," Chong added.



He said the SMART TV, already available in the market, was expected to increase Samsung's market share this year.



Samsung currently has a 33% share of the Plasma television market. – Bernama



Friday, April 20, 2012

EBay posts higher quarterly profits because of higher e-commerce

Although the strength of the consumer economy is still uncertain, ebay posts higher profits for the most recent quarter.  E-commerce has allowed the consumer to get cheaper prices on goods they want through ebay's second-price style auction business model.   

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Startup makes competition of data mining

2:23 PM, Apr. 16, 2012 | 


Kaggle president and chief scientist Jeremy Howard shields his eyes in front of a NASA hanger in Mountain View, Calif. / Paul Sakuma, AP

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Strange secrets hide in numbers. For instance, an orange used car is least likely to be a lemon.
This particular unexpected finding came to light courtesy of a data jockey who goes by the Internet alias SirGuessalot, who in fact wasn't guessing at all. Instead, he and his partner, PlanetThanet, relied on the hard math skills that make them top contenders in a sport tailor-made for the 21st century: competitive number-crunching.
The used car defect prediction contest is one of dozens hosted by San Francisco online startup Kaggle, whose creators believe they can tap the global geek population's instinct for one-upmanship to mine better answers faster from the world's ever-rising mountain of data.
"Competitions bring together a wide variety of people into a wide variety of problems," said Jeremy Howard, who became Kaggle's president and chief scientist after winning multiple competitions himself. "You get people looking at stuff they'd never look at otherwise."
While the used car contest was fun, Kaggle has its eye on weightier scientific problems. In one contest, an English major who trained himself in data science built a model for predicting the progress of HIV infections in individual patients. In another, a scientist who studies glaciers for a living won a NASA-backed Kaggle competition to measure the shapes of galaxies by mapping the universe's dark matter.
The data problems that need solving are so important that those who find the solutions should be paid like professional athletes, said Kaggle founder Anthony Goldbloom. By turning data-mining into a crowdsourced contest, he hopes he's created a way to make that happen. Already one of Kaggle's contests offers a multimillion dollar prize.
"We want to see the best data scientists earning more than Tiger Woods," said Goldbloom, who started the company in his native Australia and recently came to San Francisco's South of Market startup haven.
The job market for mathematicians and statisticians has become hot as the sheer volume of data generated by ever faster, cheaper computing resources explodes.
Data storage has become so inexpensive that a 2011 McKinsey and Co. report estimated that a disk drive capable of storing all the world's music would cost about $600. Walmart stores 10 times more data on customer transactions and other parts of its operation than is contained in the entire Library of Congress, according to the same report.
Analyzing the so-called "big data" deluge has become a key task for businesses in an effort to divine everything from which ads online customers will click to how much inventory they need to maintain. Political candidates analyze data to predict voting patterns. Dating websites try to predict ideal mates.
Kaggle competitions focus on creating and testing formulas that can be used to make predictions based on the contents of giant datasets.
The more accurate the formula, the better the chances it will accurately provide answers to complex questions, such as the orange used car being the least likely to break down.
Goldbloom argues that no matter how many data scientists companies hire, relying on in-house data talent means companies can't know if they're getting the best solution.
In a Kaggle contest, competitors find out as soon as they submit their solutions how they stack up against fellow contestants. They can keep trying for the duration of the typically three-month contests, which are highlighted on the company web site.
As the first entries come in, the accuracy of competing models improves by leaps, Goldbloom said. As the contests progress, the improvement curve flattens out. Goldbloom and Howard believe that shows the competitive approach pushes data scientists toward the best solutions within human reach.
"Crowdsourcing allows you to squeeze data dry," Goldbloom said.
Not all competitions are open to all comers, however. About 33,000 contestants have taken part in Kaggle's public competitions, where prize money tends to top out at around $10,000. Winners can get invited to participate in elite private contests, which may include access to sensitive private data sets.
Kaggle's business model depends on deep-pocketed contest sponsors like banks seeking to outdo each other with more lucrative prize purses to attract the best competitors, who themselves in theory could then make their livings off Kaggle competitions alone.
The biggest prize by far open to the public is $3 million offered by the California-based Heritage Provider Network medical group to the data scientist best able to use hospital admission records to predict the profiles of people most likely to end up in the hospital. The next-biggest purse is $100,000 in prizes put up by the Hewlett Foundation for algorithms that can automatically grade student essays.
In its grandest vision of itself, the 11-person company backed by PayPal co-founder Max Levchin will have tens of thousands of competitions running simultaneously. Guilds of data gurus will band together to unleash software that enters competitions automatically. Kaggle becomes not just a way to push humans to perform at their best but to make machines themselves smarter as code-based contestants battle and "learn" from their mistakes.
In this way, Howard said, data competitions become steps along the development of artificial intelligence systems such as self-driving cars.
As for why orange used cars are most likely to be in good shape, the numbers did not hold the answer. One notion was that such a flashy color would only attract car fanatics who would be more likely to take care of their vehicles. That didn't pan out, however, since the least well-kept used cars turned out to be purple.


Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Monday, April 16, 2012

CarrierCompare: The iPhone app your carrier doesn't want you to see

CarrierCompare: The iPhone app your carrier doesn't want you to see

@CNNMoneyTech April 13, 2012: 11:03 AM ET
A screenshot of CarrierCompare, which measures the network quality of Verizon, Sprint and AT&T's systems

A screenshot of CarrierCompare, which measures the network quality of Verizon, Sprint and AT&T systems

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- A new app hit the iTunes store Friday morning that your carrier probably isn't too thrilled about.

It's called CarrierCompare. Developed by Boston-based startup SwayMarkets, it allows you to see which carrier offers the best service for your iPhone in any given location.

The crowd-sourced app is simple to use. After you touch the start screen, the app takes about 15 seconds to analyze your network for signal strength, response time and speed. It then compares your result with other nearby results on the other two national carriers' networks.

The display is intuitive, telling you where your carrier ranks compared to the competition.

Sounds pretty simple, right? But iPhone carriers Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500), AT&T (T, Fortune 500) and Sprint (S, Fortune 500) have successfully kept that information out of the public's view -- until now.

Carriers rigorously test their networks and their rivals' networks, hiring third-party surveyors to perform comparisons. However, those surveys are almost always performed under non-disclosure agreements.

Each carrier provides its own coverage map to customers, and some even offer a street-level view. (Here are the maps for Sprint, Verizon and AT&T.)

But that still doesn't give users the kind of precise detail that CarrierCompare provides -- and the carriers certainly don't offer up direct, pinpoint comparisons against the competition.

"There is an imbalance of information out there," said Amos Epstein, founder of SwayMarkets. "Each carrier knows its own network and hires people to drive around in trucks to measure its rivals' service as well. But they haven't gone as far to release data that's tangible and useful to the consumer.

Carriers also get that data from apps they make handset manufacturers install on their devices. Sprint and AT&T use an app called CarrierIQ, which sends that kind of information -- and more -- back to the carriers.

After landing in the crossfire of a giant controversy around the secrecy of that data, CarrierIQ urged its carrier customers to release that information to consumers. So far, none have done it.

Calling CarrierIQ "a cautionary tale," Epstein said CarrierCompare is designed to make visible metrics that are typically hidden from consumers' view.

The app tracks three data points.

"Signal" represents a granular, numerical interpretation of service bars, which gives a more accurate reading than a one-through-five bar graph representation.

"Response" measures how long it takes for the network to respond to a request. It's an important metric for Internet use, such as Web browsing, posting pictures to Facebook and downloading apps. A lower response time indicates a better result.

"Speed" is in indicator of how much information the network allows your phone to download in a second. Good 3G service can be as fast as 2 Megabits per second during non-peak hours, and 4G service can be more than five times faster than that.

Here's the catch: The app is only as good as its crowd-sourced data. SwayMarkets has a starting data set pulled in from its previously released NetSnaps app, but CarrierCompare will only become really useful if a critical mass of people adopt it.

Right now, the app only performs the one function -- touch and compare. But within a few weeks, the SwayMarkets team said CarrierCompare will become much more dynamic.

When the second version is released, the app will allow users to collect network comparison data in the background, while other apps are in use. That will let the app detect network information throughout a user's day and produce an analysis on the best carrier for that specific users, factoring in things like their typical commute route and work location.

That "set it and forget it" capability will also allow users to check in every once in a while and see how their their network is holding up

CarrierCompare is on sale for $1.99, and an ad-supported version is available for free. The app is only available on the iPhone for now, but the SwayMarkets team said Android versions are in the works. To top of page